By Gary E. Wilson, President & Designated Broker, Wilson Management, Inc.
Office management agreements look similar to other commercial agreements on the surface and differ in three places that matter: the base-year and expense recovery work is more intricate, tenant improvement projects are frequent enough to need their own fee treatment, and energy compliance has become a standing obligation rather than an occasional one.
Each of those changes what the fee should cover, and none of them is visible from the percentage.
Fee models
Percentage of collected revenue is standard, calculated on what is actually collected rather than billed.
Percentage with a monthly minimum applies at smaller buildings where a pure percentage would not support proper management.
The revenue base needs defining. Establish whether it includes base rent, operating expense recovery, after-hours HVAC charges, parking income, storage income, and any signage or antenna license income.
Recovery income is the item to isolate. It is largely a pass-through, and including it at the full rate produces a fee disproportionate to the work — though the administration of recovery is genuinely substantial in office, which is an argument for pricing that work rather than excluding it entirely.
Construction management fees
Office buildings run tenant improvement projects continuously, and managing them is real work: drawing review, contractor coordination, progress inspection, allowance administration and close-out.
This is usually compensated separately, commonly as a percentage of project cost. The questions to settle:
- What rate, and on what cost base — hard costs only, or including soft costs?
- Does it apply to landlord work, tenant work, or both?
- Is there a threshold below which no fee applies?
- Who bears it — the landlord, or is it charged against the tenant improvement allowance?
That last point is worth clarity. A construction management fee charged against the allowance reduces what the tenant actually receives, and tenants notice.
Energy compliance scope
This is new enough that many agreements do not address it, and it is now a recurring obligation.
Establish who is responsible for benchmarking and reporting, who obtains whole-building energy data from tenants and utilities, who prepares the operations and maintenance program and energy management plan the state standard requires, and who tracks compliance dates.
For a Seattle building there are two separate obligations — the city's annual benchmarking under SMC 22.920 and the state Clean Buildings Performance Standard — and an agreement silent on both leaves a gap that produces fines. See Seattle Energy Benchmarking and Office Energy Compliance.
What is normally included
- Rent and recovery billing, collection and arrears follow-up
- Operating expense reconciliation and annual true-up
- Lease administration — abstracts, critical dates, options, escalations
- Estoppel certificates and lender or purchaser support
- Tenant relations and service request handling
- Building operations and vendor supervision
- Routine inspection
- After-hours service administration and billing
- Access control and credential administration
- Monthly financial reporting
What is normally excluded and billed separately
- Maintenance and repair costs themselves
- Capital projects
- Construction management on tenant improvements
- Leasing commissions
- Tenant improvement allowances
- Legal costs
- On-site engineering or security staffing
- Insurance premiums, taxes and licenses
- Energy consultant fees, where compliance requires them
Reporting to expect
Monthly, at minimum:
- Income and expense against budget, with variances explained
- Arrears, aged
- Occupancy and the expiry schedule
- Critical dates upcoming
- Reconciliation status
- Maintenance completed and capital items tracked
- After-hours service billed
The expiry schedule is the item most worth insisting on. Office expiries cluster, and a building with a large share of income ending in one year is carrying a risk that is manageable two years out and difficult six months out. A manager reporting only current occupancy is not surfacing it.
Questions to ask before signing
Fee
- What is in the revenue base, specifically recovery income?
- Is there a minimum?
- What is the construction management fee, on what base, and who bears it?
Lease administration
- Can I see a sample abstract and a critical-date report?
- How are amendments integrated?
- How quickly can you produce estoppels?
Recovery
- How do you handle a building with tenants on different base years?
- How is expense classification kept consistent year over year?
- When are reconciliations delivered?
Compliance
- Who handles benchmarking and the state standard, and is it inside the fee?
- How do you obtain whole-building data where tenants hold their own accounts?
Relationship
- Term, notice, termination, and what happens on a sale
- Who owns the abstracts, tenant records and condition history, and how are they handed over?
What a manager should be adding
Beyond collecting rent, office management value concentrates in four areas:
Lease administration that does not leak. A missed escalation is not recoverable and compounds for the remaining term. This is the most consequential and least visible thing a manager does.
Recovery that survives challenge. Reconciliations modelled per lease, classified consistently, delivered on time. Recovery is worth only what the documentation can carry.
Controls and operating discipline. The largest available operating savings in most office buildings sit in schedules and controls rather than in equipment.
Compliance handled rather than discovered. Deadlines that arrive whether or not anyone is tracking them.
An agreement producing none of those is expensive at any percentage.
Self-managing an office building
For a single-tenant building on a long lease with a strong covenant, self-management can be entirely rational — there is genuinely little to administer.
For a multi-tenant building, the administrative load is where the money is won or lost, and it is continuous: escalations on different dates, options with different windows, base years that must be applied consistently, after-hours service that has to be tracked to be recovered, and reconciliations that have to be defensible.
The honest test: could you produce today a schedule of every option window, escalation date and base year across your rent roll? If not, that is the gap — and it is the expensive one, because none of it announces itself when it is missed.
Comparing proposals
Office scopes vary enough that percentage comparison alone is misleading. Build a projected annual total for each proposal: the management fee on its defined base, plus construction management at the rate proposed against expected project volume, plus everything billed separately.
Construction management is the variable most often left out of the comparison, and in a building with regular tenant turnover it is not small. A manager with a lower management percentage and a higher construction management rate can cost more overall.
Then test the assumptions. A manager forecasting improvement should name the mechanism — recovering after-hours service that is currently unbilled, correcting an expense classification that has been under-recovering, closing a gap between contractual and applied escalations, or reducing an operating line with a specific measure. Anything arriving as a percentage with nothing behind it is a sales figure rather than a plan.
One question worth asking directly: "what would you expect to find wrong when you take this over?" An experienced office manager has a list — unapplied escalations, options nobody tracked, base years applied inconsistently, after-hours service never billed. Being told that in advance is a better sign than being told everything looks fine.
Transitioning between managers
The handover is where continuity is won or lost, and it is worth agreeing before signing rather than discovering afterwards.
What has to transfer: executed leases with every amendment, current abstracts and the critical-date schedule, base-year determinations and the reconciliation history behind them, tenant contact records, service and warranty documentation, vendor agreements, maintenance and condition history, access credential records, and the utility account and benchmarking history.
Two items are routinely lost and expensive to reconstruct. Base-year determinations with the workings behind them — without them, a reconciliation cannot be defended when a tenant challenges it. And condition and service history, which is what allows capital planning to be based on evidence rather than on the age of the equipment.
Agreeing in the management agreement that these records belong to the owner, and that they transfer in usable form on termination, costs nothing at signing and prevents a genuinely difficult problem later.
Where to go next
Our Office Property Management page sets out what we cover, and Lease Administration, HVAC and Air Quality and Energy Compliance go into the areas that most affect returns.
Contact us or request a free analysis to discuss your building.
About the author
Gary E. Wilson is the President and Designated Broker of Wilson Management, Inc., which he has led in serving property owners across Bellevue and the Greater Seattle area since 1982. With more than 40 years of hands-on experience, Gary helps owners protect and maximize the value of single-family, multi-family, and commercial properties.
More about Gary → · Get a free rental analysis →